Typical Corporate Media

Of course, a day after the story about Giuliani’s terrorist supporting connections comes out, the mainstream corporate media is dead silent about the report.

No mention on CNN.

No mention on Fox (duh).

It has even disappeared from MSNBC.

I sent a link of the report to I-Report of CNN, kindly asking them to report on the story is they are still a journalistic organization. I guess we know the answer to that.

So I guess it is up to the blogosphere (Democratic Underground, Huffington Post, Crooks and Liars, Truthdig, The Daily Kos, etc.) as well as brave patriots like Keith Olbermann to keep a focus on this story. This is too important not to demand accountability from Mr. Giuliani.

And for those of you who are literacy impaired (yes you, Mr. Bush), here is a little cheat sheet, courtesy of The Daily Kos:


Click on photo for larger image

I think the picture help makes the point; Rudy is in bed with some very bad guys, and doesn’t want to American public to know it. Expose this impostor now, before he is entrusted with the security of our nation.

Rudy caught in the wrong bed

Hey Rudy, where’s your client list?

Now if you follow the news, you will probably assume that I am writing about the revelations today that Rudy Giuliani has some trouble with cooked books during his time as New York City Mayor (see Comptroller questioned Giuliani’s security spending). And while that is a funny story, given that security was given to his family while it was also given to him during his tryst with his then-mistress and now latest wife, the fact of the matter is that this is small potatoes.

No, Rudy has his hand in a far different cookie jar.

It turns out that as head of his security consulting firm, good old “Trust me to defend you against terrorists” Rudy was providing security services to the leadership of the nation of Qatar.

The trouble with this?

Well, other than being a consistent state sponsor of terrorism, The Village Voice is reporting that the same people that Rudy was doing business with facilitated the flight of Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, the 9/11 “mastermind” himself, several years prior to the 9/11 attacks. In fact, one of the royals also served as host on multiple occasions to none other than… drum roll please… Osama bin Laden, hosting him at a private farm. Giuliani was even quietly in attendance (working for his Qatar employers) at an Asian Games event where Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was in attendance as a special guest.

Rudy’s Ties to a Terror Sheikh
Giuliani’s business contracts tie him to the man who let 9/11’s mastermind escape the FBI
by Wayne Barrett
November 27th, 2007 3:39 PM

Three weeks after 9/11, when the roar of fighter jets still haunted the city’s skyline, the emir of gas-rich Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifah al-Thani, toured Ground Zero. Although a member of the emir’s own royal family had harbored the man who would later be identified as the mastermind of the attack—a man named Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, often referred to in intelligence circles by his initials, KSM—al-Thani rushed to New York in its aftermath, offering to make a $3 million donation, principally to the families of its victims. Rudy Giuliani, apparently unaware of what the FBI and CIA had long known about Qatari links to Al Qaeda, appeared on CNN with al-Thani that night and vouched for the emir when Larry King asked the mayor: “You are a friend of his, are you not?”

“We had a very good meeting yesterday. Very good,” said Giuliani, adding that he was “very, very grateful” for al-Thani’s generosity. It was no cinch, of course, that Giuliani would take the money: A week later, he famously rejected a $10 million donation from a Saudi prince who advised America that it should “adopt a more balanced stand toward the Palestinian cause.” (Giuliani continues to congratulate himself for that snub on the campaign trail.) Al-Thani waited a month before expressing essentially the same feelings when he returned to New York for a meeting of the U.N. General Assembly and stressed how important it was to “distinguish” between the “phenomenon” of 9/11 and “the legitimate struggles” of the Palestinians “to get rid of the yoke of illegitimate occupation and subjugation.” Al-Thani then accused Israel of “state terrorism” against the Palestinians.

But there was another reason to think twice about accepting al-Thani’s generosity that Giuliani had to have been aware of, even as he heaped praise on the emir. Al Jazeera, the Arabic news network based in Qatar (pronounced “Cutter”), had been all but created by al-Thani, who was its largest shareholder. The Bush administration was so upset with the coverage of Osama bin Laden’s pronouncements and the U.S. threats to bomb Afghanistan that Secretary of State Colin Powell met the emir just hours before Giuliani’s on-air endorsement and asked him to tone down the state-subsidized channel’s Islamist footage and rhetoric. The six-foot-eight, 350-pound al-Thani, who was pumping about $30 million a year into Al Jazeera at the time, refused Powell’s request, citing the need for “a free and credible media.” The administration’s burgeoning distaste for what it would later brand “Terror TV” was already so palpable that King—hardly a newsman—asked the emir if he would help “spread the word” that the U.S. was “not targeting the average Afghan citizen.” Al-Thani ignored the question—right before Giuliani rushed in to praise him again.

Full story here…

I have read this entire story and there is nothing criminal that Rudy has done. But it also clear, having read the story and listening to the author in an interview tonight, that Rudy had to be aware of the connections he was in the midst of. He simply chose to ignore any problematic connections because he was faced with the prospect of collecting millions of dollars, thinking that this story would never see the light of day.

Hey asshole, you were wrong.

Read this story, you Rudy of Arabia lovers, and tell me this is the guy you will trust the defense of the United States of America to. He was a pretender on 9/11 and he remains a pretender today. The man is a fraud and this story should force some interesting comments in the days ahead. Now if only the corporate media will force him to answer for his lack of judgment.

Or, if he does go on and get elected, he’ll probably be able to find Osama bin Laden. After all, he’ll no doubt find himself at a cook-out in Qatar where our dear friend Osama will be in attendance. Heck, Sheikh Rudy’s company might even unknowingly provide his security arrangements.

Of course Rudy, all you have to do is to reveal your client list… you know, the one you have so jealously guarded until now.

I wonder why that would be.

A Nation of Sheep

Wow… who would have thought that the censors at Fox Noise would let this one get through? Great commentary!

Congressional Dems screw up again, use discredited General as spokesman

The Congressional Democrats are definitely on their way to having about as much credibility as George W. Bush.

They cave on domestic surveillance and assist George W. Bush in dismantling our personal liberties.

They give more and more money for a failed and illegal war and occupation.

They give tacit agreement to the Congressional Republicans that they will not bring up the word “impeachment”, requiring them to overlook repeated and continuous criminal offenses by the President and members of his administration.

Hell, they even assisted Bush in polarizing Iran, trusting Bush (that’s right, trusting the war-monger) not to strike.

And now, just to make sure that we know that they can screw up anything, they choose discredited General Sanchez (you remember Abu Ghraib?) as their spokesperson for delivering a rebuttal to the President’s radio address.

Anybody want to tell me that the two-party system has not utterly failed this nation? I can’t decide if we need a revolution or an enema.

The Democrats ‘Fear Up Harsh’
Posted on Nov 27, 2007
By Amy Goodman

Every Saturday, the president of the United States gives a radio address to the nation. It is followed by the Democratic response, usually given by a senator or representative. This past Saturday the Democrats chose retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez to give their response, the same general named in at least three lawsuits in the U.S. and Europe for authorizing torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq. This, combined with the Democrats’ endorsement of Attorney General Michael Mukasey despite his unwillingness to label waterboarding as torture, indicates that the Democrats are increasingly aligned with President Bush’s torture policies.

Sanchez headed the U.S. Army’s operations in Iraq from June 2003 to June 2004. In September 2003, Sanchez issued a memo authorizing numerous techniques, from “Stress Positions” to the use of “Military Working Dogs” to exploit “Arab fear of dogs” during interrogations. He was in charge when the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison occurred.

Full story here…

Weight Loss Progress, Week 3

Well I am off to a pretty good start. I am through three weeks and have lost 12 pounds to date… and that is pretty much just through my eating. I have been sick for a week, so exercise hasn’t been high on the agenda, but is now that I am starting to see a light at the end of the tunnel.

Just to re-cap… money for weight lost will be donated to Thirst Relief International.

Sponsors (in chronological order):

Rick Olshak - $5 per pound
Jim Almeda - $1 per pound; flat $100 if more than 50 pounds are lost
Joe Palmo - $1 per pound
Sandy Colbs - $1 per pound
Diane Dean - $1 per pound
Vincent S. Boyd - $1 per pound; plus $1 for each pound he loses
Jason Robbins - $1 per pound
Jill Camper - $1 per pound
Mark Cassata - $1 per pound
Mike Breitner - $1 per pound
Brandie Miller Riegle - $1 per pound
Ann Caldwell - $1 per pound
Mary Weber - $1 per pound
Allison Graham - $1 per pound
Jason Nippa - $1 per pound
Dave Horstein - $1 per pound
Kevin Martin - $1 per pound
Tom Palmer - $1 per pound, plus matching if it stays off for a year
Gigi Fansler - $1 per pound
Rick Lewis - $1 per pound
Dr. Helen Mamarchev - $1 per pound

Current Total: $25 per pound plus incentives

Total $ Raised to Date: $300.00

Evangelical Madness

You HAVE to watch this video… thanks to Mixter for a great post on this one.

Ah yes, this video is perfect evidence as to why evolution is impossible and why we should ignore volumes of scientific data that support the evolution of species.

Now, go to God Tube and watch some of these knuckleheads in action on video. If someone wants to tell me these folks aren’t at least as scary as “radical Islamic terrorists” they need to get themselves examined, and fast.

I have no problem with people having “faith” that there is a God; more power to them. But it is inexcusable to deny scientific evidence through pseudo-scientific means as a way of pontificating one’s point. Get over yourselves. If there is a God, and if this God in any way embodies the teachings of Jesus Christ, then intolerant zealots are in for a rude awakening at their arrival at the Pearly Gates.

“What do you mean I have to take the ‘down’ escalator? I was a good Christian. I persecuted everyone who didn’t think like me.”

Um, yeah. Next.

My Tuesday Tantrum

Well, not really a tantrum… I am too sick to throw a tantrum. I’ve had the damn flu for almost a week now and am getting a little tired of being cooped up at home. I am finally starting to feel better, but still sitting in bed today to gather up some strength to get back to work.

In the meantime I have not blogged nearly as much as I would like, and there are just too many good headlines to let pass. So between coughs I am going to at least capture the items closest to the surface.

Sean Taylor Killed

I am sure by now that most people know that Redskins’ safety Sean Taylor was killed after a burglar broke into his home and shot him. Taylor died defending his girlfriend and his young child. While Taylor had been a bit of a problem child for the Redskins, including an incident last year where he spit on another player, Taylor had for all accounts gotten his life on track and was nursing an injury to his knee at home at the time of the break-in. According to Clinton Portis, Taylor’s teammate both on the Redskins and at the University of Miami, “It’s hard to expect a man to grow up overnight. But ever since he had his child, it was like a new Sean, and everybody around here knew it. He was always smiling, always happy, always talking about his child.”

To think that there is a little child that will never know her dad because of some trigger-happy punk is a real tragedy.

More on Sean Taylor here…

If He Only Had a Heart…

OK, it’s probably not nice to make fun of medical conditions, but this one is too good to pass up…

Naturally my first reaction when I heard that Vice President Cheney was going in for a “heart procedure” was to hope that the doctors were going to trick the veep and put in a heart while he was under. But alas, no such luck. Instead, it was merely another Frankenstein jolt to keep our zombie of a Vice President moving. Damn you, Science.

More on Frankenstein here…

He’s Right, You Know…

As Hillary’s fight for the nomination continues on, I am thankful that Barack Obama is making a point that needs to be made. According to Obama, “I think the fact of the matter is that Sen. Clinton is claiming basically the entire eight years of the Clinton presidency as her own, except for the stuff that didn’t work out, in which case she says she has nothing to do with it. … There is no doubt that Bill Clinton had faith in her and consulted with her on issues, in the same way that I would consult with Michelle, if there were issues. … On the other hand, I don’t think Michelle would claim that she is the best qualified person to be a United States Senator by virtue of me talking to her on occasion about the work I’ve done.” (source)

That’s right, Hillary, being the wife of a President does not qualify as presidential experience.

It’s my impression that Hillary is so enamored with being president that she is running to whatever political ground seems the most advantageous, without regard to principle. And the reason I am distressed about this is that, left to her own devices, Hillary has relatively sound principles. But she is no Bill Clinton, and I think she is selling her political soul right now for the advantage, which will only result in a strengthening of the status quo during her presidency, something the health care industry, defense industry, and multinational corporations will be only too happy to see.

Stop the Presses

That’s right, I am going to publicly admit that Pat Buchanan just might have a point.

*gasp*

While I find Buchanan relatively amusing most nights on MSNBC, I never put much stock into his political positions. While he has a fair amount of common sense, his political “whorism” and his natural slant to the right always leave me scratching my head. And, despite the fact that Pat may have some points, I never agree with his solutions. Buchanan still doesn’t believe in global warming and seems to be enamored with Ron Paul, who I am pretty sure is insane.

But on this one Pat may well have some points that we don’t want to hear.

In his new book “State of Emergency”, Buchanan attacks illegal (and legal) immigration as well as free trade for having contributed to the demise of the American economy. I still remember Buchanan talking about these issues when he was running for President, and think there are some elements of truth to be found in his arguments. Most notably, I am becoming increasingly convinced that free trade is having negative affects on our economy and we have devolved into a consuming nation rather than a producing one. In addition to seeing our dollar devalued, it occurs to me that we are relying on the good will of our competitors, sometime adversaries, to look out for our best interests. The recent problems of products from China underscores my concern; what do the Chinese care if some American babies die from putting some of the Chinese-made toys into their mouths? I think I am starting to lean towards getting on board with Buchanan and Lou Dobbs in thinking that NAFTA was a really bad idea and that we might want to return to the days of protective trade with tariffs where necessary.

Buchanan also spends a fair amount of time it seems (I haven’t read the book yet), bashing the imperialism of the Bush Administration and its rush to start World War Three. On that Pat and I can both agree. Interestingly, an article from the Left (from Truthdig) underscore the end result of the administration’s policies. This is worth the read:

America in the Time of Empire
Posted on Nov 26, 2007
By Chris Hedges

This column was originally published by the Philadelphia Inquirer.

All great empires and nations decay from within. By the time they hobble off the world stage, overrun by the hordes at the gates or vanishing quietly into the pages of history books, what made them successful and powerful no longer has relevance. This rot takes place over decades, as with the Soviet Union, or, even longer, as with the Roman, Ottoman or Austro-Hungarian empires. It is often imperceptible.

Dying empires cling until the very end to the outward trappings of power. They mask their weakness behind a costly and technologically advanced military. They pursue increasingly unrealistic imperial ambitions. They stifle dissent with efficient and often ruthless mechanisms of control. They lose the capacity for empathy, which allows them to see themselves through the eyes of others, to create a world of accommodation rather than strife. The creeds and noble ideals of the nation become empty cliches, used to justify acts of greater plunder, corruption and violence. By the end, there is only a raw lust for power and few willing to confront it.

The most damning indicators of national decline are upon us. We have watched an oligarchy rise to take economic and political power. The top 1 percent of the population has amassed more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined, creating economic disparities unseen since the Depression. If Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes president, we will see the presidency controlled by two families for the last 24 years.

Massive debt, much of it in the hands of the Chinese, keeps piling up as we fund absurd imperial projects and useless foreign wars. Democratic freedoms are diminished in the name of national security. And the erosion of basic services, from education to health care to public housing, has left tens of millions of citizens in despair. The displacement of genuine debate and civil and political discourse with the noise and glitter of public spectacle and entertainment has left us ignorant of the outside world, and blind to how it perceives us. We are fed trivia and celebrity gossip in place of news.

An increasing number of voices, especially within the military, are speaking to this stark deterioration. They describe a political class that no longer knows how to separate personal gain from the common good, a class driving the nation into the ground.

“There has been a glaring and unfortunate display of incompetent strategic leadership within our national leaders,” retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the former commander of forces in Iraq, recently told the New York Times, adding that civilian officials have been “derelict in their duties” and guilty of a “lust for power.”

The American working class, once the most prosperous on Earth, has been politically disempowered, impoverished and abandoned. Manufacturing jobs have been shipped overseas. State and federal assistance programs have been slashed. The corporations, those that orchestrated the flight of jobs and the abolishment of workers’ rights, control every federal agency in Washington, including the Department of Labor. They have dismantled the regulations that had made the country’s managed capitalism a success for ordinary men and women. The Democratic and Republican Parties now take corporate money and do the bidding of corporate interests.

Philadelphia is a textbook example. The city has seen a precipitous decline in manufacturing jobs, jobs that allowed households to live comfortably on one salary. The city had 35 percent of its workforce employed in the manufacturing sector in 1950, perhaps the zenith of the American empire. Thirty years later, this had fallen to 20 percent. Today it is 8.8 percent. Commensurate jobs, jobs that offer benefits, health care and most important enough money to provide hope for the future, no longer exist. The former manufacturing centers from Flint, Mich., to Youngstown, Ohio, are open sores, testaments to a growing internal collapse.

The United States has gone from being the world’s largest creditor to its largest debtor. As of September 2006, the country was, for the first time in a century, paying out more than it received in investments. Trillions of dollars go into defense while the nation’s infrastructure, from levees in New Orleans to highway bridges in Minnesota, collapses. We spend almost as much on military power as the rest of the world combined, while Social Security and Medicare entitlements are jeopardized because of huge deficits. Money is available for war, but not for the simple necessities of daily life.

Nothing makes these diseased priorities more starkly clear than what the White House did last week. On the same day, Tuesday, President Bush vetoed a domestic spending bill for education, job training and health programs, yet signed another bill giving the Pentagon about $471 billion for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1. All this in the shadow of a Joint Economic Committee report suggesting that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been twice as expensive than previously imagined, almost $1.5 trillion.

The decision to measure the strength of the state in military terms is fatal. It leads to a growing cynicism among a disenchanted citizenry and a Hobbesian ethic of individual gain at the expense of everyone else. Few want to fight and die for a Halliburton or an Exxon. This is why we do not have a draft. It is why taxes have not been raised and we borrow to fund the war. It is why the state has organized, and spends billions to maintain, a mercenary army in Iraq. We leave the fighting and dying mostly to our poor and hired killers. No nationwide sacrifices are required. We will worry about it later.

It all amounts to a tacit complicity on the part of a passive population. This permits the oligarchy to squander capital and lives. It creates a world where we speak exclusively in the language of violence. It has plunged us into an endless cycle of war and conflict that is draining away the vitality, resources and promise of the nation.

It signals the twilight of our empire.


Saving the Worst For Last

And finally to end this uplifting blog entry, I was following (between naps) the story of Baby Grace, who turns out to be 2 year old Riley Ann Sawyers. It turns out she was beaten to death and held underwater by both her mom and her mom’s husband. I watched the press conference with her dad and grandmother yesterday and my heart just sank seeing how devastated they were. What kind of sick fuck would do something like this to a defenseless two year old? I don’t care how disorderly kids can be or how much they get on your nerves on a bad day (remember I have three kids), it is inconceivable to me to take my frustration out on a kid.


Riley Ann Sawyers: She deserved better than this

According to news reports, mom’s husband (Royce Zeigler) tried to take his own life but was unsuccessful. How typical of such a coward not to be able to complete a simple suicide but to be able to inflict such harm on a child. I’m glad his attempt was unsuccessful and I hope he spends his prison life bunking with people who treat him the way he treated Riley.

OK, that’s about all the news I can handle blogging about for now. Sufficed to say that instances like these make me question why we even allowed to carry on as a society. When it is so easy for parents to abuse their kids, for our political leaders to abuse us, and for people to callously take the lives of others, what redeeming value do we hold?

And I know that I don’t treat my kids that way, nor do most parents, but anyone with a conscience has to be affected by these types of actions. They detract from all of us.

Week 12 Power Rankings and Week 13 Picks

Week 12 Power Rankings

1. New England Patriots (11-0, unchanged) - The Eagles gave them their toughest test yet, but the mark of a champion is winning games like this

2. Dallas Cowboys (10-1, unchanged) - Anybody doubting that the Cowboys are better than the Steelers need only look at the Jets for evidence

3. Green Bay Packers (10-1, unchanged) - Great win over Detroit on the road; real test upcoming against the Cowboys

4. Jacksonville Jaguars (8-3, unchanged) - The big test comes this week at Indianapolis

5. Indianapolis Colts (9-2, +1) - Solid win after some early trouble; big test against the Jags now in the wings

6. Pittsburgh Steelers (8-3, +1) - Lost to the Jets and struggled against the Fins, but still 8-3; oh, and could someone tell me who the hell thought that turf replacement was a good idea this week?

7. Cleveland Browns (7-4, +1) - Great offensive balance has this team on a roll

8. New York Giants (7-4, -3) - Rank the Giants with the Steelers; not ready for the big boys

9. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (7-4, unchanged) - Important win over the Redskins has the Bucs smelling a division crown

10. Seattle Seahawks (7-4, unchanged) - Sometimes it pays to be lucky rather than good

11. Tennessee Titans (6-5, unchanged) - Fading…

12. Detroit Lions (6-5, unchanged) - Too inconsistent to be a real threat

13. San Diego Chargers (6-5, +1) - Good one week, bad the next…

14. Washington Redskins (5-6, -1) - The road was going to be tough enough, but the shooting of Sean Taylor has got to be a tremendous blow to the spirits of this club

15. Buffalo Bills (5-6, unchanged) - Playing the Pats and Jags back to back has taken some steam out of their engine

16. Houston Texans (5-6, unchanged) - Almost there…

17. Arizona Cardinals (5-6, unchanged) - A stellar performance by Warner nullified in one play

18. Denver Broncos (5-6, unchanged) - So who is the bigger idiot, Todd Sauerbrun or Mike Shanahan? Too close for me to call

19. Philadelphia Eagles (5-6, unchanged) - Gutsy performance against the Patriots, but any momentum likely to be lost with McNabb’s return

20. New Orleans Saints (5-6, unchanged) - So they decided to show up again this week?

21. Minnesota Vikings (5-6, +2) - So much for having a horrible secondary, eh Eli?

22. Chicago Bears (5-6, +3) - The Bears’ organization had better send a “Thank You” card to the Rocky Mountains; what a gift

23. Carolina Panthers (4-7, -1) - Put a fork in their playoff chances

24. Baltimore Ravens (4-7, -3) - Last year’s AFC overachiever now draws the Patriots

25. Kansas City Chiefs (4-7, -1) - Colby Smith’s debut spoiled by Culpepper’s efficient performance

26. Cincinnati Bengals (4-7, unchanged) - Chad Johnson lights up the Titan’s secondary for a big day

27. Atlanta Falcons (3-8, unchanged) - They had opportunities, but too many mistakes to close the gap against the Colts

28. Oakland Raiders (3-8, +2) - Is this team finally starting to find itself?

29. San Francisco (3-8, +2) - Thanks Kurt, you temporarily cost the Patriots a spot or two in the next draft

30. St. Louis (2-9, -2) - The Rams let another one get away

31. New York Jets (2-9, -2) - Well, I guess you can’t play the Steelers every week

32. Miami (0-11, unchanged) - Maybe next week against the Jets…

Week 13 Picks

Dallas over Green Bay - The NFC battle of the year so far; only going with the Cowboys due to home field

Miami over New York Jets - Yes, I’m picking the Fins to win a game; as much as I’d like to see them go 0-16, the fact is that the Jets are a bad football team

Minnesota over Detroit - The Vikings win the clash of the playoff pretenders

Seattle over Philadelphia - The Seahawks are improving despite not playing the first half against the Rams, while the Eagles spent all their energy on the Patriots… McNabb’s return will not be a benefit

Houston over Tennessee - Mild upset, but the Titans continue to fade while the Texans come on

Jacksonville over Indianapolis - The flaws get exposed against an impressive squad

Buffalo over Washington - The Bills bounce back against more comparable competition

San Diego over Kansas City - OK, I’ll get crazy and expect the Chargers to show up two weeks in a row

Carolina over San Francisco - If the Panthers are going to stop the bleeding, it has to be this week

Atlanta over St. Louis - Because I flipped a coin, OK?

Cleveland over Arizona - The Cards are favored somehow, but expect the Browns to continue to play like they are for real

Oakland over Denver - OK, I know this is an unlikely upset, but the Raiders had the first game stolen from them, and I really just can’t stand the Broncos

Tampa Bay over New Orleans - The Saints are just too inconsistent, and the Bucs aren’t

New York Giants over Chicago - Don’t kick to Devin Hester!

Pittsburgh over Cincinnati - The Steelers won’t play down to the level of competition again, right?

New England over Baltimore - No, the Ravens won’t get much from the Eagles’ efforts, but they will get the Patriots’ wrath; Patriots 35 Ravens 10

Last Week: 8-8

Season: 114-62 (.648)

Pats Win, but get all they can handle from the Eagles

Kudos to the Philadelphia Eagles. Their team showed great coaching, solid performance and a lot of spirit as they caught a somewhat flat New England Patriots team off-balance ad gave them all they could handle before the Patriots emerged with a 31-28 victory Sunday night to improve their record to 11-0.


Wes Welker was the Pats’ workhorse Sunday night

The Patriots’ offense continued its solid play despite having to adjust to seeing Randy Moss functionally taken out of the game by the Eagles’ coverage. Wes Welker was the one to pick up the slack as the Patriots used a shotgun 4 wide receiver set most of the night, tallying 13 catches for 149 yards.


Jabar Gaffney had a great touchdown reception, with both toes
coming down just before the right knee hit the turf
(see replay in Video Highlights below)

Despite the offensive performance, the Patriots left too many points out on the field Sunday night, missing a chip shot field goal and being stripped of a Randy Moss touchdown by what could be generously called a tick-tack offensive pass interference call against Moss.


Asante Samuel got the team off to a great start
with this interception return for a touchdown on
the third offensive play of the game

The Patriots defensive philosophy of “bend but don’t break” was put to the test, as the Patriots bent a lot and even broke a few times. The middle of the field was exploited all night by AJ Feely who had a magnificent performance despite two key interceptions by Asante Samuel. The Patriots lost Rosevelt Colvin, Randall Gay and Ellis Hobbs to injuries during the course of the contest.

The next game for the Patriots comes next Monday night in Baltimore against the Ravens. While I think that most teams will pay close attention to what the Eagles did against the Patriots, the fact is that the Eagles have a combination of excellent coaching, great execution and team speed that most teams won’t be able to conjure up.

Game Book

Video Highlights

All images provided by patriots.com

Clinton Clueless on NAFTA, and more…

I voted for Bill Clinton in both 1992 and 1996… easiest votes I ever cast. The man is and was a thoughtful policy wonk and I always knew that even if I did not agree with him on a given position, things were being weighed carefully in his mind, and the man had a lot more information than I did.

His wife however, is another story. While I was initially excited about Hillary’s candidacy, it has become quite evident since campaigning began that she is no Bill Clinton. Her votes on both Iraq and Iran are distressing, the latter especially so given the history that has emerged from the first vote. She has not truly raised civil liberties as an issue important to Americans, and I have no reason to believe that the liberties stolen from us under Dubya will be returned in a Hillary administration. On health care, Hillary has folded like a cheap tent, selling out to special interests in a move that would only net her modest (and irrelevant) changes in health care reform. Then, this blunder (below), when asked about NAFTA. Her answer was a pathetic attempt to minimize the issue or else demonstrate her lack of knowledge. In fact, it served both purposes.

Al Gore… where are you?

The only two Democrats with spines are not carrying the day. Senator Russ Feingold (WI) says what needs to be said, but he is not running for President and doesn’t have sufficient influence to change the political landscape. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (OH) is running for President and, while I agree with him on almost every position, the fact of the matter is that he will be steamrolled by the top three candidates (Clinton, Obama, and Edwards).

2008 is not shaping up to appeal to those of us who identify as liberals. We are left with idiots on the right who still blindly support a failed President in a failed war. On the left, we have candidates so afraid of their own shadows that they don’t dare stand erect.

The political landscape in America is a frakking mess.

Thus, it looks like Dennis Kucinich gets my vote in the Illinois primary. And, at this rate, it looks like I will be writing my own name in during the general election.

What the hell… I couldn’t do any worse than Dubya.

Was Ross Perot Right?
Posted on Nov 22, 2007
By David Sirota

Editor’s Note: Truthdig welcomes David Sirota to our lineup of regular columnists. Look for him every week, right here.

“Ross Perot was fiercely against NAFTA. Knowing what we know now, was Ross Perot right?”

That’s what CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked Hillary Clinton at last week’s Democratic presidential debate. It was a straightforward query about a Clinton administration trade policy that polls show the public now hates, and it was appropriately directed to a candidate who has previously praised NAFTA.

In response, Clinton stumbled. First she laughed at Perot, then she joked that “all I can remember from that is a bunch of charts,” and then she claimed the whole NAFTA debate “is a vague memory.” The behavior showed how politically tone deaf some Democratic leaders are.

To refresh Clinton’s “vague memory,” let’s recall that Perot’s anti-NAFTA presidential campaign in 1992 won 19 percent of the presidential vote—the highest total for any third-party candidate since Teddy Roosevelt. That included huge tallies in closely divided regions like the Rocky Mountain West, which Democrats say they need to win in the upcoming election.

A Democrat laughing at Perot on national television is a big mistake. Simply put, it risks alienating the roughly 20 million people who cast their votes for the Texas businessman.

But Clinton’s flippant comments and feigned memory lapse about NAFTA were the bigger mistakes in that they insulted the millions of Americans (Perot voters or otherwise) harmed by the trade pact. These are people who have seen their jobs outsourced and paychecks slashed thanks to a trade policy forcing them into a wage-cutting war with oppressed foreign workers.

Why is Clinton desperate to avoid discussing NAFTA? Because she and other congressional Democrats are currently pushing a Peru Free Trade Agreement at the behest of their corporate campaign contributors—an agreement expanding the unpopular NAFTA model. When pressed, Clinton claims she is for a “timeout” from such trade deals—but, as her husband might say, it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is, since she simultaneously supports the NAFTA expansion.

Of course, this deviousness is precisely why it is worth asking about Perot’s predictions: to make sure America has an informed and honest discussion about impending new trade policies before they are enacted.

And so without further ado, let’s answer the question Clinton ducked: Was Ross Perot right?

Full story here…